Inward Bound Center for Nonprofit Leadership
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 272504072
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2022
- Location
- Pasadena, CA, USA
- Phone
- 4043868434
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Nonprofit Management
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $47,850
- Expenses
- $20,226
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
People named in this filing
- CATHERINE A PERRY (Exec. Director)
- JOHN TUURI (Director)
- KATHERINE BRANCH (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Vision: InwardBound Center envisions the day when nonprofits, especially those focused on eliminating poverty, rank on the Best Places to Work lists, known for outstanding leadership and the ability to grow leaders from within. Funders and donors discover that investing in leadership development increases their return on investment of their program dollars.The Center: Offers training and development to nonprofit leaders, and pays outstanding certified coaches to conduct coaching and training. Creates social media communications and website to share advice and learning. Adapted programs to be successfully delivered virtually on Zoom and other platforms. Areas of expertise include working with diverse nonprofit teams, and values-based leadership. Before Covid, held periodic nonprofit leadership summits in person. Each board member signs a Conflict of Interest Policy annually.
What it reported doing in 2022
Program Service Accomplishements: Creates social media communications and website content to share advice and learning. Adapted programs to be successfully delivered virtually via Zoom and other multimedia platforms. Areas of expertise include working with diverse nonprofit teams and values-based leadership. Pre-Covid, held periodic nonprofit in-person leadership summits. Each board member signs a Conflict of Interest Policy annually.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 85% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 64
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 51
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 42.3%; rating input score 42
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 57.7%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.9% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -2.9% per year; rating input score 0; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2.9% per year; rating input score 0; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 42.3% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $20K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2010 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 42/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is recorded as not currently operating in California.