Investigative Taskforce On

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
453327365
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2012
Official website data refreshed
Jun 2026
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2012
Location
Santa Cruz, CA, USA
Phone
8316008639
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Judaism
Affiliation
Judaism

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$112,304
Expenses
$76,374
Assets
$52,594

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The aim of the Investigative Taskforce on Campus Antisemitism is to investigate and report on incidents of antisemitism and their effect on Jewish students, faculty, and staff at institutions of higher education in the United States, including state universities, community colleges, and private colleges and universities.

What it reported doing in 2012

ITCA investigated concerns from students at California State University at Northridge and at University of California at Los Angeles that they had experienced what they perceived to be anti-Semitic harassment and hostility at University campuses. ITCA investigated and affirmed the student concerns and publicized the fact that faculty at both universities used university public resources to promote their own personal political agenda, an agenda that has been labeled as anti-Semitic by the U.S. State Department Special Envoy to Monitor Global Antisemitism.ITCA is now mounting a Map Project that investigates anti-Semitic incidents, faculty, and student groups at various universities across the U.S. When sufficient data are collected, reports will be written and sent to university officials, and posted on the ITCA website.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 58
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 32%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.69; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 116.5% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -66.2% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2011 to 2012
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 52/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is recorded as not currently operating in California.