Intricate Minds

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
923235742
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Springfield, IL, USA
Phone
2177619209
Rating
57
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Health Support Services

Reported finances

Revenue
$22,800
Expenses
$22,800
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Tiara Standage (Executive Director)
  • Reginald Guyton (Board President)

People named in this filing

  • Tiara Standage (Executive Director)
  • Reginald Guyton (Board President)
  • Robert Gause-Wills (Board Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Intricate Minds intends to stimulate the Black Community and our allies to reduce the stigma related to mental health, HIV, drug use, and identifying as LGBTQ+. Established in 2023, Intricate Minds is a community and warming center which provides free drop-in harm reduction and wellness services and supplies to individuals, most of whom are low-income and/or unhoused. In 2024, Intricate Minds served an average of 250 individuals per month in the harm reduction program, and had close to 3,000 total individual interactions for the year. So far in 2025, we have provided 440 free haircuts, 880 sack lunches, 1100 warm meals, 500 doses of Narcan to reverse opioid overdose, and more.

What it reported doing in 2024

In 2024, Intricate Minds served an average of 250 individuals per month in the harm reduction program, and had close to 3,000 total individual interactions for the year. So far in 2025, we have provided 440 free haircuts, 880 sack lunches, 1100 warm meals, 500 doses of Narcan to reverse opioid overdose, and more.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 46
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 28
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 45.8%; rating input score 46
  • Program expense ratio: 45.8%; rating input score 46

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 45.8% of revenue deployed · 45.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $10K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 46/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 46/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 45/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.