Intrepid Care
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 934403306
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2023
- Location
- Cibolo, TX, USA
- Phone
- 8326517777
- Rating
- 58
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $191,302
- Expenses
- $168,587
- Assets
- $9,251
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- MICHAEL (BARKER): $48,071 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The nbsp; mission nbsp; of nbsp; intrepid nbsp; care nbsp; is nbsp; to nbsp; provide nbsp; assistance nbsp; relief nbsp; and nbsp; support nbsp; to nbsp; veterans nbsp; service nbsp; members nbsp; first nbsp; responders nbsp; their nbsp; families nbsp; and nbsp; the nbsp; community
What it reported doing in 2024
Support and valor initiative-provide veterans and first responders with the financial tools they need to help plan for the future offering education and assistance in managing finances budgeting and planning for long-term stability. In addition we offer critical counseling and support services to address mental health challenges including ptsd depression anger management and fostering camaraderie. Through personalized programs peer support and expert resources we ensure that our heroes receive the care understanding and guidance they deserve to thrive both financially and emotionally. Through community outreach advocacy and partnerships we work to honor their sacrifices promote resilience and ensure they receive the care and recognition they deserve.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 63% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The program-spending lines do not add up, so the filing cannot show reliably whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
MIXED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 58
- Accountability: 16
- Sustainability: 42
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 87.7%; rating input score 88
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 80%; rating input score 80; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 0%; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 11.9%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.05; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 28.5%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 198.7% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 175.6% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 87.7% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 3 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $98K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $48K · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 17 of 20 current checks pass · 3 findings to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 4/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Series expense component sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.