Inti Academy Ltd
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 264232954
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2021
- Location
- Manchester, NH, USA
- Phone
- 2012476969
- Rating
- 64
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Youth Development Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $102,324
- Expenses
- $65,674
- Assets
- $168,947
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
People named in this filing
- Thomas Bellen (Board Member)
- Bruno Victal (Board Member)
- Nicholas Green (Board Member)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Raise funds to be able to grant to other organizations that provide educational and soccer programs to disadvantage children. In addition, individual donations to disadvantaged students that have some relationship with Inti (present and/or past)
What it reported doing in 2025
Inti Academy is a non profit that its main goal is to gather funds from the community and use them to support children in the Manchester community by providing educational support after school hours, art and science development/discovering and soccer development/training, by partnering with local business.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 73% for direct work, and 27% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 35
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 77
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 29.3%; rating input score 29
- Program expense ratio: 45.5%; rating input score 46
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 35.8%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.57; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.6%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -18.9% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.4% per year; rating input score 100; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13.3% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 29.3% of revenue deployed · 45.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $30K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2014 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 29/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 46/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 24/100.