Interstate Projects Non Profit Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
471959526
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2015
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2015
Location
Brooklyn, NY, USA
Phone
7184128726
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Arts, Cultural Organizations - Multipurpose

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$0
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Jamie Sterns (Secretary)
  • Jesse Bransford (Board Member)
  • Andrew Russeth (Board Member)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Interstate Projects' mission is to incubate, support and increase the dialogue of artistic practices through largescale, ambitious solo exhibitions and collaborative group shows as well as enabling contact and discourse between artists and curators throughout the United States and internationally. Focusing on new artistic practices, Interstate Projects gives artists the rare and unfettered opportunity to actualize large projects that expand their capacities by using the physicality of the gallery space in tandem with their creative ambitions and the technical and curatorial support of the organization. Interstate Projects is a zone of experimentation whose primary dedication is to support artists so that they can have a healthy and uncapitalized focus to explore and develop their practice in a safe, nurturing and supportive environment that is made up of peers and networked communities.

What it reported doing in 2015

In 2015, Interstate Projects Non Profit fulfilled its program goals. We hosted 15 exhibitions by a diverse group of artists, produced dozens of new works of art, and hosted many one night public performances and readings. The organization also increased its public charity status by beginning the planning stages of a new residency program onsite at the gallery, which will be available to four artists per year in an open call application.

Operating model

Revenue model
No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 55
  • Sustainability: NotEnoughData
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: Limited
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Series filing activity did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.