Interstate Natural Gas Assn of America

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
730529079
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Washington, DC, USA
Phone
2022165954
Rating confidence
Limited

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$8,170,134
Expenses
$8,755,320
Assets
$15,653,097
Liabilities
$7,618,221

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

44 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • AMY ANDRYSZAK CAMPBELL (PRESIDENT & CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • AMY ANDRYSZAK CAMPBELL (PRESIDENT & CEO): $957,905 total reported compensation
  • JOAN D JACKSON (SVP, SECRETARY & GENERAL COUNSEL): $606,546 total reported compensation
  • ROBERT J MOSHER (VP, GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS): $329,146 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Ingaa is an advocacy organization that represents the interstate natural gas pipeline industry in the united states. Ingaa represents the interests of its members through comments on rulemakings and other regulatory initiatives undertaken by federal agencies with jurisdiction over its member companies' activities or whose actions otherwise affect its member companies, testimony filed and direct advocacy with committees of the united states congress and, on occasion, through participation in federal and state judicial proceedings in which its members' collective interests are at stake.

What it reported doing in 2024

Regulatory/environment: ingaa developed and advocated for proposed revisions to nepa, cwa section 401, nationwide permits, and other applicable federal regulations. Ingaa actively engages with the federal energy regulatory commission and filed comments in proceedings where appropriate. Ingaa continued to engage in litigation where precedential questions or regulations affecting interstate natural gas pipelines are at stake including related to epa's good neighbor rule, epa's methane rule, phmsa's gas transmission rule 2, and seven county infrastructure coalition vs. Eagle county (a nepa related case). Ingaa developed and promoted association positions and commitments related to methane emissions mitigation. Ingaa filed comments in multiple environmental rulemakings at epa. Ingaa actively engaged with multiple federal agencies and related groups to advance greater reliability and coordination between the gas and electric industries including nerc, naesb, naruc, and ferc. Ingaa also developed a voluntary set of winterization commitments. Ingaa works with federal government partners to enhance the physical and cybersecurity of natural gas pipelines. This includes participation in the oil and natural gas sector coordinating council and partnership with the downstream natural gas isac.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 93% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 28
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -7.2%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.79; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.49; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 38.2%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -0.6% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 22nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 27 of 27 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $958K · 44 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.4M reported
  • Consistency: 13 of 13 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 17/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Document-retention policy not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 58/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 22/100.