Interreligious Partners in Action
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 341687658
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2011
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2011
- Location
- Cleveland, OH, USA
- Phone
- 216-361-5890
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Interfaith Coalitions
- Affiliation
- Interfaith
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $139,042
- Expenses
- $154,838
- Assets
- $41,354
- Liabilities
- $1,353
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Promote mutual understanding and appreciation of diverse religious beliefs and practices, and help shape positive responses to the challenges and opportunities facing Greater Cleveland (including religious diversity). Members Staff | | InterReligious Partners in Action of Greater Cleveland is a coalition of more than fifty Baha'i, Christian, Islamic, Jewish, and Unitarian Universalist congregations and religious communities. InterAct Cleveland was created and is sustained by Greater Cleveland's religious community as a vehicle for dialogue, service, and advocacy. It provides a structure through which religious communities and individuals can follow the mandates of their faith to improve the quality of life for their brothers and sisters. InterAct Cleveland helps to create partnerships among diverse people. Through InterAct Cleveland, over 1,500 volunteers participate in an array of...
What it reported doing in 2011
"interreligious activities: interreligious activities include discussions and ongoing dialogue groups; celebrations and service; an annual meeting; interreligious forums; and cooperation with various interreligious groups in the greater cleveland area. Ongoing dialogues include a monthly clergy discussion group. Interreligious celebrations and services include a pilot sharing thanks program that includes a jewish and a muslim congregation in a year-long dialogue, service, and celebration.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 88% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 30
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -11.4%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.27; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $131K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 22/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 51/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.