Interplay Child Care Center Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 251896952
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2016
- Forms available
- Form 990 2016, Form 990-EZ 2009
- Location
- Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Phone
- 4123716255
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Child Day Care
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $406,537
- Expenses
- $447,863
- Assets
- $55,287
- Liabilities
- $114,379
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ANNA OMOREGIE (PRESIDENT)
- LAUREN REYNOLDS (VICE PRESIDENT)
- JOY GIBSON (FORMER- INTERIM EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- JOY GIBSON (FORMER- INTERIM EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $34,820 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization's mission is to provide exceptional, individualized early childhood education focused on emotional, cognitive, physical, and social growth. As a non-profit organization, we strive to afford families access to the highest quality care. (continued on schedule o) the organization is a place where children can explore their own boundaries; educationally emotionally, and socially. A place where the unlimited potential within each child is recognized and encouraged to grow. A place where children can learn to develop self-reliance, self-esteem and a healthy, natural respect for themselves and others. And it's a place where the value of seeing each individual as a complete, dynamic person, is the most important value of all.
What it reported doing in 2016
Provided daycare services to more than 40 children during the year.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 88% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 84
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 17
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 92.5%; rating input score 92
- Program expense ratio: 83.9%; rating input score 84
- Fundraising efficiency: $9.75 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -10.2%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.12; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 2.07; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.8%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.3% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.8% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 29.4% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 92.5% of revenue deployed · 83.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $376K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $35K · 15 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2010 to 2016
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 41/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 21/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 8/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 36/100.