Interpeace Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
141877608
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Westbury, NY, USA
Phone
5169979005
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
International Development

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$3,500
Assets
$9,901
Liabilities
$7,000

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ITONDE KAKOMA (President)
  • SIMON GIMSON (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • ITONDE KAKOMA (President)
  • SIMON GIMSON (Vice President)
  • Duncan Maina (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Interpeace works in partnership with local teams to reinforce their capacities to manage conflict peacefully. We help societies address fundamental issues that make or break peace by working on resolving these differeces through constructive dialogue and creating home grown solutions for a more peaceful future.

What it reported doing in 2025

Interpeace Inc has made no grants to projects since 2015. This is due to the low level of donations received. Interpeace Inc continues to liaise in New York with United Nations member states for the global work on peacebuilding, particularly youth and human rights dimensions. The parent body of Interpeace Inc, based in Switzerland, has recently adopted a new five-year Strategy that envisages enhanced presence and activities by Interpeace Inc in the period 2021-2025.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 38
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 29
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.83; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.71; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.8% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -25.1% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -7.8% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 6/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.