Internetbarorg Inc C/o Kenneth J Vacovec Esq

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
202682863
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2008
Location
Newton, MA, USA
Phone
5086283865
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Research Institutes and Public Policy Analysis

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,497
Expenses
$4,001
Assets
$5,197
Liabilities
$57,102

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JEFFREY ARESTY (PRESIDENT, DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • JEFFREY ARESTY (PRESIDENT, DIRECTOR)
  • KENNETH VACOVEC (TREASURER, DIRECTOR)
  • JACQUELINE KLOSEK (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To address issues associated with the practice of law in cyberspace, including, without limitation, the harmonizing of international laws that affect human rights, legal ethics, privacy, identity theft and e-commerce, and to address other issues that may emerge as globalization and virtual practices evolve, and to engage generally in any activity which may lawfully be carried on by a corporation which is exempt from federal income taxation under section 501(c)(6) of the internal revenue code 1986, as both may be in effect from time to time.

What it reported doing in 2024

To address issues associated with the practice of law in cyberspace, including, without limitation, the harmonizing of international laws that affect human rights, legal ethics, privacy, idenity theft and e-commerce, and to address other issues that may emerge as globilization and virtual practices evolve, and to engage generally in any activity which may lawfully be carried on by a corporation which is exempt from federal income taxation under section 501(c)(6) of the internal revenue code 1986, as both may be in effect from time to time.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 25
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -167.3%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.3; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 10.99; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 21.6% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.