International Women's Health Coalition
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237378153
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2021
- Forms available
- Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2021
- Location
- New York, NY, USA
- Phone
- 6463695831
- Rating
- 40
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Private Operating Foundations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $142,825
- Expenses
- $270,887
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
People named in this filing
- KATHLEEN REGAN (BOARD CHAIR)
- ALEXANDER M FARMAN-FARMAIAN (VICE CHAIR)
- HELENA CHOI (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
In order to achieve gender justice, iwhc advances the sexual and reproductive health and rights of women and adolescent girls by: funding and supporting feminst leaders, organizations, and movements, primarily in the global south; advocating for international and us policies, programs, and funding, and holding governments to their commitments; and generating knowledge and leading dialogues on critical and emergent issues.
What it reported doing in 2021
In may 2021, the coalition entered into an agreement to transfer its assets and operations to ippf and the board approved dissolution of the coalition. Accordingly, assets and liabilities as of may 31, 2021 were revalued to the amounts expected to be collected and paid during liquidation. Due to the nature of the assets and liabilities, no revaluation adjustments were required. Differences between the revalued amounts and actual cash transactions will be recognized in the year they can be estimated. Any remaining net assets in liquidation were distributed to the fos feminista and will be used exclusively for charitable, religious or educational purposes within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code. Management liquidated on december 31, 2021.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 70% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 8
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -89.7%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -1.5% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2.2% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.