International Trademark Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
131427696
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Official website data refreshed
Aug 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
New York, NY, USA
Phone
2127689887
Rating confidence
Limited

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$29,137,594
Expenses
$25,624,111
Assets
$42,276,435
Liabilities
$15,396,361

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

58 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DEBORAH HAMPTON (PRESIDENT ELECT)
  • ELISABETH STEWART BRADLEY (PRESIDENT)
  • MARLOU VAN DE BRAAK (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • SERGIO BARRAGAN (TREASURER (UNTIL 11/2025) / VICE PRESIDENT)
  • ETIENNE SANZ DE ACEDO (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)

Highest reported compensation

  • ETIENNE SANZ DE ACEDO (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $1,007,681 total reported compensation
  • HEATHER STEINMEYER (CHIEF POLICY OFFICER): $365,245 total reported compensation
  • RANDI MUSTELLO (CHIEF GOVERNANCE OFFICER): $316,342 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission and structure of our global association for brand owners and professionals

What it reported doing in 2025

We were founded in 1878 by 17 merchants and manufacturers who saw a need for an organization "to protect and promote the rights of trademark owners, to secure useful legislation, and to give aid and encouragement to all efforts for the advancement and observance of trademark rights." since then, we have grown into a global community, with members around the world and offices in multiple regions. Our membership comprises more than 6,600 organizations from 182 jurisdictions. The organizations represent nearly 38,000 professionals, including brand owners from major corporations, small- and medium-sized enterprises, law firms, and nonprofits. Our community also includes government agency members, professors, and law students. Our most important asset is the talented and dedicated group of individuals who serve on our committees. From advising on policy positions to creating resources and communicating on key issues, their expertise and contributions enhance our work-benefiting industry stakeholders and society. Our events embody the spirit of community. We integrate cutting-edge education and global expertise with unparalleled networking opportunities. Among the many types of events we hold in various regions or virtually, our renowned annual meeting is the largest - and it's also the largest gathering of brand owners and ip professionals in the world. We offer practical, on-the-ground information covering trademark and related areas of law throughout the world. Our much-used resources include the inta practice guides, reference and training tools, fact sheets, and our well-respected peer-reviewed journal, the trademark reporter. Our staff collaborate with more than 600 members to develop and update these resources. Given the proliferation of counterfeiting worldwide, our awareness-raising campaign to educate young consumers about the value of trademarks and brands and the dangers of counterfeit products has been growing in importance and impact. Our unreal campaign committee and other volunteers are the backbone of this initiative, which reaches students in schools, at youth organizations, and virtually. With trademarks impacting so many aspects of our daily lives, consumers-whether they realize it or not-can benefit from understanding this ip right and taking a closer look at brands. We provide the basics and explain hot-button issues, such as counterfeiting, in language that resonates with consumers.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 97% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 55
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 49
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
  • Grant itemization coverage: Scored; rating input score 0
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 12.1%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.65; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.36; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 12.8%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -17.1% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: Mission, programs, and operating context captured from the official website.
  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 37 of 37 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $1M · 58 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $6.7M reported
  • Consistency: 12 of 12 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 16/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 36/100.