International Support for Immigrants
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 923780318
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- Auburn, WA, USA
- Phone
- 2064123872
- Rating
- 44
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $178,000
- Expenses
- $70,070
- Assets
- $107,930
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- OLGA EFIMOVA (Executive Director)
- Viacheslav Chornovol (President)
People named in this filing
- OLGA EFIMOVA (Executive Director)
- Viacheslav Chornovol (President)
- Oleksandr Chernovol (SecretaryTreasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
International Support for Immigrants ISFI is organized and operated exclusively for charitable and educational purposes within the meaning of Section 501c3 of the Internal Revenue Code The organizations primary exempt purpose is to provide humanitarian assistance to individuals and families in need through charitable donations and community support services ISFI carries out its mission by distributing essential goods and financial assistance to underserved and vulnerable families including those experiencing economic hardship or displacement In addition ISFI provides services to help individuals access critical resources communicate effectively and navigate everyday challenges Through these activities ISFI aims to alleviate immediate hardship promote community stability and improve access to essential services for those facing language and financial barriers No part of the organizations net earnings inures to the benefit of any private individual
What it reported doing in 2025
0
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 76
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 60.6%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.54; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 28.5%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 13/100.