International Society of Urologic Surgeons

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
411689408
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2014
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2014
Location
Rochester, MN, USA
Phone
5072843249
Rating
43
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Surgery Specialties

Reported finances

Revenue
$65,000
Expenses
$90,284
Assets
$31,421
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MITCHELL HUMPHREYS MD (PAST PRESIDENT)
  • ALDEN REINE MD (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • STEPHEN KRAMER MD (PROGRAM DIRECTOR)
  • PEG HURLEY (SECRETARY)
  • MITCHELL HUMPHREYS MD (PAST PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The furtherance of scientific urology through promotion of the science of urology, in part through activities which benefit the general public and are described in law as the promotion of education.

What it reported doing in 2014

The furtherance of scientific urology through promotion of the science of urology, in part through activities which benefit the general public and are described in law as the promotion of education, and which include: a. Group discussions pertinent to urology. B. Exchange and development of ideas related to clinical experience and research. C. Address of issues unique to the furtherance of healthcare related to urology. D. Promotion of fellowship and exchange among members practicing urology.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 77% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 28
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -38.9%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.35; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 0.3% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -18.4% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2011 to 2014
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 13/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.