International Society for the Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 840743126
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Englewood, CO, USA
- Phone
- 3038645220
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $568,736
- Expenses
- $548,664
- Assets
- $945,608
- Liabilities
- $21,841
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
14 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- PRAGATHI TUMMALA MPH (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- PRAGATHI TUMMALA MPH (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $184,920 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organizations primary mission is the prevention of all forms of child abuse, neglect and exploitation worldwide.
What it reported doing in 2024
Membership services programs - to facilitate the exchange of information and education of professionals working to prevent and treat child abuse and neglect worlwide. The organization has approximately 1,250 members in 100 countries around the world. Programs include training, consultation, and education, including and resources development and support of regional resource centers in latin america africa and the middle east. Ispcan also provides technical assistance and support to the working group on child maltreatment data collection, including support of development of related publications, research and coordination of technical activities. Iscpan also maintains training materials and curricula, which are available in 6 languages. The objective is to provide consultation services and technical assistance to help countries and child protection organizations establish or improve their child protection systems, assist with assessment of compliance with the united nations convention on the rights of the child, develop child abuse data collection systems, conduct research on child maltreatment, assist contries to develop child protection polisied, and assist in the establishment of monitoring and evaluation programs for child protection services. Research and publications include child abuse and neglect - the international journal (the journal), a monthly peer-reviewed publication provided to the organizations members, approx. 12,500 issues of the journal are published. Members also have online access to all previous issues of the journal. Link newsletters were also written and provided on a triannual basis to the organizations members via email and posting on the organizations website, as well as printed copies available for distribution at conferences.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 76% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 62
- Transparency & Controls: 77
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 47
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 66.7%; rating input score 67
- Program expense ratio: 72.5%; rating input score 73
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 3.5%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.72; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 33.7%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -0.2% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.3% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 66.7% of revenue deployed · 72.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $398K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $185K · 14 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 46/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.