International Problem Gambling and Gaming Certification Organization

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
800431437
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Rating
57
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Gambling Addiction

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$67,088
Expenses
$42,346
Assets
$73,411

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JODY BECHTOLD (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JODY BECHTOLD (PRESIDENT)
  • ELLIOTT RAPPORT (VICE PRESIDE)
  • CHRISTINA COOK (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The ipggc supports clinical and helping professionals, in the fields of problem gambling and gaming, to become competent and qualified to work with individuals and families impacted by gambling and gaming harms. This is achieved through various certifications that all require proper training and education, knowledge testing and exams, and direct experience. These certifications provide professionals with the ability to identify, assist, and help those impacted by expanding gambling and gaming across the country and globe. These certifications provide a standardization in a field with few federal regulations.

What it reported doing in 2024

The ipggc currently supports individuals and organizations that provide training/education and access to these certifications.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 42
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 65
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 34.3%; rating input score 34
  • Program expense ratio: 54.3%; rating input score 54

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 36.9%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.73; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 34.3% of revenue deployed · 54.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $23K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 34/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 54/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.