International Planned Parenthood Federation - Worldwide Inc

What it reported doing in 2025

Activities to support the global work of ippf, a global service provider and advocate of sexual & reproductive health and rights for all. Ippf, through its more than 150 member associations and collaborative partners, deliver high quality sexual and reproductive healthcare and helps advance sexual and reproductive rights, especially for marginalized people with intersectional and diverse needs that are currently unmet. Ippf's member associations and partners are locally owned, independent organizations, which means the support and care they provide are informed by local ippf advocates for a world where people have the information, they need to make informed decisions about their sexual health and bodies. Ippf stands up and fight for sexual and reproductive rights and against those who seek to deny people their human right to bodily autonomy and freedom. Ippf deliver care rooted in rights, respect, and dignity - no matter what.through support from the levi strauss foundation, ippf expanded access to sexual and reproductive health (srh) services for garment factory workers while strengthening the financial sustainability of its member associations (mas) in south asia, specifically in sri lanka and bangladesh. Under the outreach component, over 20,000 srh services were delivered to approximately 6,000 clients through more than 120 static, mobile, and associated clinic sessions in sri lanka, alongside awareness initiatives reaching over 7,000 workers. In bangladesh, 48 workplace-based mobile health camps provided essential srh services to approximately 1,600 workers, while outreach activities reached over 20,000 individuals with srh information through iec materials, peer engagement, and digital platforms. In parallel, the social enterprise component strengthened institutional capacity across 15 mas, with 37 participants completing a structured capacity-building program (achieving 100% module completion and 84% engagement), 379 active users on the se academy platform, and 6 mas supported with market research and business planning. These results demonstrate measurable improvements in service access, community reach, and institutional sustainability achieved through donor funding.in 2025 ippf's harm mitigation task force conducted a survey and established a transparent grant making mechanism with agreed criteria to allocate funding to ippf mas and cps. Approximately us $3.9 million in grants was allocated to 29 mas/cps to support essential services and access to lifesaving sexual and reproductive health commodities with a focus on marginalized and excluded populations, of which $3.06m was disbursed in 2025. Westwind's contribution to the fund supported this round of grants, alongside contributions from ippf's reserves and donors including the governments of norway, china, and support from ippf's global affairs canada-funded empowher project.during the year 2025, eco trust helped us by providing unrestricted donations for supporting the implementation of our strategy and bessemer trust provided usd 300,000 to ippf as general support to profamilia, our member association in colombia.in 2025, bergstrom funded projects cemoplaf and profamilia helped to successfully maintain the provision of essential sexual and reproductive health (srh) services in prioritized areas, guaranteeing access to long-acting contraceptive methods, voluntary termination of pregnancy (vtp), and educational spaces. The exercise of reproductive autonomy was strengthened, evidenced by the high rate of voluntary implant removals and informed changes in methods. Community education activities were sustained, even within a more restrictive operational context. The first training activities were conducted with healthcare providers in monteria and pasto, with the participation of 60 health professionals and decision-makers from the regions.the bifurcation of population served by cemoplaf services, by gender and age, represents 84% women this semester, of whom 28% are ad

Financial Efficiency

• Mission deployment rate: 65.3%; rating input score 65
• Program expense ratio: 65.7%; rating input score 66
• Fundraising efficiency: $3.29 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

• Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
• Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
  • Compensation committee: Missing
  • Independent consultant: Missing
  • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
  • Written employment contract: Missing
  • Compensation survey or study: Missing
  • Board or committee approval: Missing
• Foreign activity oversight: 0 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 0
  • Claims monitoring procedures: Limited
  • Requires narrative reports: Limited
  • Conducts field audits: Limited
  • May suspend future funding: Limited
  • Requires financial reports: Limited
  • Conducts site visits: Limited
  • Requires grant agreements: Limited
  • May require repayment: Limited
• Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
• Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
• Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

• Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
• Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
  • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
  • Whistleblower policy: Pass
  • Document-retention policy: Pass
  • CEO compensation review process: Fail
  • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
  • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
  • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
  • Audit committee oversight: Pass
  • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

• Operating margin: 0.7%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
• Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.07; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
• Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.74; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
• Officer compensation ratio: 18.4%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

• Program expense growth: -0.9% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
• Revenue growth: -2.8% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
• Asset growth: 1.7% per year; rating input score 100; 16th percentile among comparable filings