International Network of Safety and Health Professional Organisations
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 272026773
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2019
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2019, Form 990-N 2015
- Location
- Park Ridge, IL, USA
- Phone
- 8476992929
- Rating
- 46
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- International Health Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $59,647
- Expenses
- $31,617
- Assets
- $109,793
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BARRY WILKES (PRESIDENT)
- NATHAN WINTER (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
- JOHN HOLLOHAN (VICE PRESIDENT)
- ELDEEN POZNIAK (IMMEDIATE PAST-PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- BARRY WILKES (PRESIDENT)
- NATHAN WINTER (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
- JOHN HOLLOHAN (VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The international network of safety and health professional organizations is the global voice for the occupational safety and health profession and acts as a forum for international collaboration among professional organizations to improve safety and health at work
What it reported doing in 2019
Developed articles for peer reviewed journalto document the development of inshpo capability frameworkand utilization in multiple countries
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 19
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 72
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 14.2%; rating input score 14
- Program expense ratio: 26.7%; rating input score 27
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 47%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.47; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 14.2% of revenue deployed · 26.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $8K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 14/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 27/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.