International Network of Integrative Mental Health Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 272992214
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2013–2014
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2014
- Location
- Fair Haven, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 7327472944
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- International Health Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $9,146
- Expenses
- $9,853
- Assets
- $12,068
- Liabilities
- $10,000
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JUDITH PENTZ MD (Vice President)
- RONALD GLICK MD (President)
People named in this filing
- JUDITH PENTZ MD (Vice President)
- STEPHANIE GADSEN PHD (Secretary)
- RONALD GLICK MD (President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
INIMH Inc. is in the process of creation of a global network of clinicians, researchers and mental health advocates who are committed to advancing the paradigm of integrative mental health care by bringing together the wisdom of world healing traditions and modern science.
What it reported doing in 2014
It has created an internet website to provide professional and social support and expert resources of the global integrative health community. It plans to develop and publish a journal on integrative mental health.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 38
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -7.7%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.22; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.83; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -16.5% per year; rating input score 0; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 43% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -5.7% per year; rating input score 0; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $10K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2013 to 2014
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 31/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 8/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.