International Mentoring Program Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
874832940
IRS 990 coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2023
Location
Wildwood, MO, USA
Phone
6367519303
Rating
66
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$200
Expenses
$402,726
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Annie Schlafly (President)
  • Kris Brill (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Annie Schlafly (President)
  • Kris Brill (Vice President)
  • Chelsey Winsor (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We are a 501(c)(3) non-profit corporation with the mission to connect international women and their families with St. Louis area women and help welcome and integrate them into the St. Louis community; to educate and increase awareness of international cultures and experiences within the St. Louis community; and work to eliminate prejudice, discrimination, and biases of the community toward individuals of different cultures.

What it reported doing in 2025

International Mentoring St. Louis: Core Program. The International Mentoring St. Louis program was a year-long initiative that connected international women and their families with St. Louisans and helped them thrive in the region. Through meaningful mentorships, the organization worked to enhance intercultural awareness and make St. Louis a more welcoming and inclusive community for newcomers. The program promoted cross-cultural understanding, community engagement, and personal growth through a variety of educational, social, and professional development opportunities for international women and their families. Programming included cultural presentations, an international book club, cultural tours, theatre outings, and recreational activities that fostered meaningful connections, cultural exchange, and a stronger sense of belonging within the St. Louis community. The organization also supported members' professional and civic engagement through volunteer and leadership opportunities while providing educational workshops, such as personal finance and savings sessions, to help participants navigate life in the United States and build confidence in managing their personal and professional goals. During the year, the organization wound down and ceased its operations, dissolved, and transferred its remaining assets to another organization described in section 501(c)(3).

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 58
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 76
  • Sustainability: 8
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 2.7%; rating input score 3
  • Fundraising efficiency: $0.24 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -201,263%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -141.8% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -30.8% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -15.2% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 2.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $11K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 22 of 22 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 3/100.
  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 10/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.