International Longshoremens and Warehousemens Union Local 23
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 910268325
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Fife, WA, USA
- Phone
- 2533832468
- Rating
- 37
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,773,147
- Expenses
- $5,327,104
- Assets
- $3,128,740
- Liabilities
- $21,830
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
65 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- Jared Faker (Presidnt/Caucus): $331,928 total reported compensation
- Wyatt Ellis (Bus Agnt/Caucus): $323,494 total reported compensation
- Conrad Spell (Bus Agnt/Caucus): $298,288 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To unite in one organization, regardless of religion, race, creed, color, gender, sexual orientation, political affiliation or nationality, all workers within its jurisdiction, to maintain and improve wages, hours and working conditions for its members, to educate the membership of the history of the american labor movement and present day labor problems and tactics, to secure legislation in the interests of labor and to oppose anti-labor legislation.
What it reported doing in 2025
The organization's program service accomplishments were negotiations of wages, hours, benefits and working conditions and hearing and settlement of grievances.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 95% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
REVIEW - Most voting board members are independent and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 53
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 20
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 11.3%; rating input score 11; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 80.3%; rating input score 80; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -11.6%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.59; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 34.8%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 4.6% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.4% per year; rating input score 100; 24th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 49 of 61 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $332K · 65 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 14 of 16 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes grants and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 34 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 11/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 8/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Whistleblower policy not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.