International Liver Transplantation Society
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 541624149
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Fredericksburg, VA, USA
- Phone
- 5403723777
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $969,061
- Expenses
- $1,056,590
- Assets
- $4,668,500
- Liabilities
- $79,625
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- NAZIA SELZNER (PRESIDENT)
- VALERIA R MAS (PRESIDENT ELECT)
- R MARK GHOBRIAL (PAST PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- NAZIA SELZNER (PRESIDENT)
- VALERIA R MAS (PRESIDENT ELECT)
- FRANCOIS DURAND (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the international liver transplantation society is to promote and disseminate multidisciplinary scientific advances in liver transplantation worldwide.
What it reported doing in 2025
Meetings: ilts hosts an annual meeting and various meetings throughout the year to provide a forum for the exchange of ideas and advancements in the field of liver transplantation, liver transplant patient care and provide ongoing education in these areas to medical professionals, researchers and educators. Other: ilts offers annual memberships and provides a journal and internet website to provide a forum for the exchange of ideas and advancements in the field of liver transplantation, liver transplant patient care and provide ongoing education in these areas to medical professionals, researchers and educators.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 94% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 92% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 70
- Transparency & Controls: 72
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 46
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 79.8%; rating input score 80
- Program expense ratio: 76.9%; rating input score 77
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: 0 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Claims monitoring procedures: Limited
- Requires narrative reports: Limited
- Conducts field audits: Limited
- May suspend future funding: Limited
- Requires financial reports: Limited
- Conducts site visits: Limited
- Requires grant agreements: Limited
- May require repayment: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -9%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.42; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -4.9% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -4.8% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 79.8% of revenue deployed · 76.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $812K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes foreign activity and grants
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 14/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 55/100.