International Live Events Association Northern California Chapter Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 943174187
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2017–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- San Francisco, CA, USA
- Phone
- 9092414386
- Rating
- 66
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $28,650
- Expenses
- $35,572
- Assets
- $75,081
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHARMAINE PAJAR (President)
- RICHARD PEREZ-PACHECO (Vice President)
- ROBERT DORSEY III (Vice President)
- REBECCA LANHAM (Vice President)
- REBECCA BLOOM (Past President)
People named in this filing
- CHARMAINE PAJAR (President)
- RICHARD PEREZ-PACHECO (Vice President)
- ROBERT DORSEY III (Vice President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Ilea northern California upholds the mission of international live events association in northern California and the surrounding areas. The mission is to promote the art and science of special event publication and to educate members and the public in the advancement, improvement and use of special events to ensure valuable services and products.
What it reported doing in 2024
Meetings to provide opportunities for members to gather and discuss new developments in the field and share ideas for improvement.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 63
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 36
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 67.6%; rating input score 68
- Program expense ratio: 54.4%; rating input score 54
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -24.2%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.11; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -17.5% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -11.7% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -10.9% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 67.6% of revenue deployed · 54.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $19K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 15 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2017 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 54/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 21/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.