International Law Association - American Branch
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 136167151
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2015–2015
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2015
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 2026629927
- Rating
- 50
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Support N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $82,171
- Expenses
- $38,051
- Assets
- $494,868
- Liabilities
- $3,950
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
24 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- PHILIP M MOREMAN (Vice President)
- CATHERINE AMIRFAR (Vice President)
- LEILA N SADAT (Vice President)
- PAUL R DUBINSKY (Vice President)
- DAVID P STEWART (President)
- ANIBAL M SABATER (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- JOHN E NOYES (Trustee)
- HOUSTON PUTNAM LOWRY (Treasurer)
- PHILIP M MOREMAN (Vice President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The american branch of the intl law assn. Studies problems of intl law and prepares reports which are published for each world conference, theamerican branch collects dues and appropriates its funds as it wishesexcept for the portion of the dues payable to the assn. Headquarters.
What it reported doing in 2015
International law association weekend expenses
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 26
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 84
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 18.4%; rating input score 18
- Program expense ratio: 39.8%; rating input score 40
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 53.7%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 13.01; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 18.4% of revenue deployed · 39.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $15K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 24 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 18/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 40/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 42/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.