International Justice Resource Center

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
274501182
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
San Francisco, CA, USA
Phone
4157354180
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
International Human Rights

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$14,852
Expenses
$21,200
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$161

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Citlalli Ochoa (President)
  • Tatum Pritchard (President)

People named in this filing

  • Lisa Reinsberg (Secretary)
  • Adam Nord (Treasurer)
  • Iain Byrne (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Empower individuals, through knowledge, to use the law and legal mechanisms for the greater protection of human rights around the world.

What it reported doing in 2024

Online Resource Hub: IJRC continued to publish updates on the regional and universal human rights bodies' activities. IJRC's Online Resource Hub content continued to be cited in academic publications, news articles, library research guides, course materials, and other sources. In 2024, these included many newly-published academic articles - in publications such as the Human Rights Law Review, International Studies Quarterly, International Organizations Law Review, Journal of International and Comparative Law, African Journal of International and Comparative Law, American University International Law Review, Brooklyn Journal of International Law, Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law, and Minnesota Journal of International Law - and chapters in books published by Elgar, Brill, Taylor & Francis, and Springer. Other references to IJRC's Online Resource Hub included new additions to library guides and learning platforms for courses at numerous institutions around the world, such as the Legal Information Institute, Loyola University Chicago, Rutgers University, and the University of Connecticut.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 78
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 14
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 87.9%; rating input score 88
  • Program expense ratio: 61.6%; rating input score 62

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -42.7%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -50.8% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -31.4% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -14.5% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 87.9% of revenue deployed · 61.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $13K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2017 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 14/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.