International Interfaith Peace Corps
Legal name: International Interfaith Peace Corp
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 352418877
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2013
- Location
- Herndon, VA, USA
- Phone
- 7034670915
- Rating
- 67
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Interfaith Coalitions
- Affiliation
- Interfaith
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $307,580
- Expenses
- $274,970
- Assets
- $30,447
- Liabilities
- $102,167
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- IMRANA UMAR (PRESIDENT AND EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- IMRANA UMAR (PRESIDENT AND EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- MOHAMED HAGMAJID ALI (CHAIRMAN)
- AHMAD NASSAR (VICE CHAIRMAN AND TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Facilitating Compassionate Coexistence by Promoting the Sanctity and Dignity of Life through Religious Diplomacy
What it reported doing in 2024
The main objectives of IIPCs 2023 - 2028 programs are to 1) create and promote proper understanding and application of Islam among Muslims, 2) change or improve the perception of Islam and Muslims among non-Muslims,3) minimize the perceived and actual harm inflicted on Muslims through marginalization and Islamophobia, and 4) maximize the perceived and actual benefit of Muslims to society in both the Global North and South. Therefore, IIPCs work in 2023 focused on engaging American and European Muslim Religious leaders in the Implementation of the Charter of Makkah. The activities of the year included: 1) organizing a multifaith event in Washington DC on Collaboration of Faith for Security, Health, and Development. 2)a major event in London for Muslim and non-Muslim religious, community, and civil society leaders to launch and create more awareness about the Charter of Makkah and communicate its implementation strategy.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 63
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Accountability: 49
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 68.1%; rating input score 68
- Program expense ratio: 76.2%; rating input score 76
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 33.3%; rating input score 33; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 10.6%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.11; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 3.36; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -11.2% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -13.1% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -21.7% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: Mission, programs, and operating context captured from the official website.
- Where the money goes: 68.1% of revenue deployed · 76.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 1 of 3 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $210K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 20 of 20 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 33/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 7/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.