International Integrity Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
832663150
IRS 990 coverage
2020–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Clifton, NJ, USA
Phone
8488000333
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$854,371
Expenses
$832,648
Assets
$27,832
Liabilities
$3,644

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MEHMET EMIN KORKMAZ (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • MEHMET OZTURK (CHAIRMAN OF): $35,181 total reported compensation
  • IBRAHIM BOZTURK (TREASURER): $14,906 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Hands for all association is an organization established in the united states, extending a helping hand to anyone in need around the world without discrimination based on language, religion, or race. It carries the undying flame of goodness while making distances closer. Conscious of the importance of every human being's right to live a dignified life, our association acts with the following missions: to reach out to those affected by natural disasters such as earthquakes and floods, to help people struggling to survive below the hunger line, to address the educational needs of our children, who are our future, among others in need of assistance. Our association serves with the aim of 'making distances closer, extending a helping hand' with a team of experts and volunteers dedicated to providing the necessary support to everyone in need.

What it reported doing in 2025

Reach out to those affected by natural disasters such as earthquakes and floods. Help people struggling to survive below the hunger line. Address the educational needs of our children, who are our future, among others in need of assistance. Our association serves with the aim of 'making distances closer, extending a helping hand' with a team of experts and volunteers dedicated to providing the necessary support to everyone in need.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 94
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 34
  • Sustainability: 28
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 93.3%; rating input score 93
  • Program expense ratio: 95.7%; rating input score 96
  • Fundraising efficiency: $535.99 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 50%; rating input score 50; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2.5%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.03; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.13; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 6%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 17.9% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 32.3% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -24.5% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 93.3% of revenue deployed · 95.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 2 of 4 board members independent · 1 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $797K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $35K · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2020 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 7 not reported.
  • Review — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 50/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 38/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 31/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 48/100.