International Institute of St. Louis
Legal name: International Institute of Metropolitan St Louis
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 430652640
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- St. Louis, MO, USA
- Phone
- 314-773-9090
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Ethnic, Immigrant Centers
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $41,346,273
- Expenses
- $39,316,424
- Assets
- $11,436,839
- Liabilities
- $2,922,706
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
32 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KARLOS RAMIREZ (PRESIDENT AND CEO (AS OF 2/24))
- ARREY OBENSON (PRESIDENT AND CEO (THRU 12/24))
Highest reported compensation
- ARREY OBENSON (PRESIDENT AND CEO (THRU 12/24)): $236,132 total reported compensation
- KARLOS RAMIREZ (PRESIDENT AND CEO (AS OF 2/24)): $200,859 total reported compensation
- DAVID GONZALEZ (VP DEVELOPMENT): $141,507 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The International Institute of St. Louis provides opportunities for immigrants and refugees to thrive in order to create a welcoming, prosperous, and healthy region for all.
What it reported doing in 2024
Case management & resettlement - see schedule ocase management & resettlement: refugee resettlement occurs over the first 90 days after a refugee arrives to st. Louis. Refugee resettlement services include airport pick-up, provision of housing and furnishings on arrival, food, clothing, and transportation. In addition to these basic needs, we provide case management, cultural orientation, linkages for initial health screenings, benefits enrollment, school enrollment, crisis intervention, and various community referrals. Staff members meet refugees at the airport, deliver them to housing rented for them, provide initial home orientation, and help them begin the process of building a new life in st. Louis. Depending on the needs of each refugee family, services can include referrals to registration for english classes for adults and public school for children, employment services, and state and federal benefits applications. Clients are assigned a case specialist of similar language and culture when available. In 2024, a total of 1,549 refugees were served, including 432 afghans, 288 congolese, and 185 syrians.the latino outreach initiative of the international institute of st. Louis supported work-eligible immigrants relocating to the st. Louis region. The program offers relocation guidance, housing resources, job search support, and education referrals, while helping newcomers connect with local networks and services to ensure a smooth transition. The program is specifically targeting latino populations to help address workforce needs and strengthen regional growth. With a strong job market, affordable cost of living, and high quality of life, the latino outreach initiative helps individuals and families successfully establish themselves in st. Louis.the afghan support program at iistl helps legally-present, work-eligible afghan individuals and families resettle in st. Louis, with a focus on secondary migrants who were initially resettled in other parts of the country and seeking affordable housing and stability. The program provides housing placement, rental assistance, and move-in support, along with orientations on tenant rights and responsibilities to promote long-term stability. Families also receive transportation assistance, grocery cards, access to social benefits, job readiness classes, employment support, english instruction, and legal services. Children benefit from school enrollment assistance and community programs like soccer, while women can build workforce skills through sewing classes. In addition, eligible afghans who arrived after august 2021 may apply for $20,000 entrepreneurship grants. The afghan journal, created and published by the afghan support program offers resources to help families stay informed and connected as they build new lives in the united states.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 80% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 64% for direct work, and 36% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 91
- Transparency & Controls: 83
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 42
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 90.1%; rating input score 90
- Program expense ratio: 94.7%; rating input score 95
- Fundraising efficiency: $79.51 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4.9%; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.29; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.26; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.4%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 19.6% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 18.5% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.8% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 90.1% of revenue deployed · 94.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 22 of 22 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 5 filed program accomplishments · $37.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $236K · 32 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $478K reported
- Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 7/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 53/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 51/100.