International House of Philadelphia
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 231365364
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2016
- Forms available
- Form 990 2016
- Location
- Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Phone
- 2158956527
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- International Academic Exchange
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,142,641
- Expenses
- $1,958,080
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
20 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JAMES M PAPADA III (TRUSTEE/ INTEIM PRESIDENT & CEO)
- TANYA STEINBERG (PRESIDENT AND CEO(OCT 16))
People named in this filing
- JAMES M PAPADA III (TRUSTEE/ INTEIM PRESIDENT & CEO)
- STEVEN J CASPER (TREASURER)
- CONSTANCE W BENOLIEL-ROCK (TRUSTEE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
International house philadelphia is a multicultural residential center and a source of distinctive programming. It has a critical three-fold mission: to maintain a diverse and welcoming community for scholars from around the world, while introducing them to the american experience; to broaden the horizons of its residents and the greater philadelphia community through high quality international arts and humanities programs; and to encourage understanding, respect, and cooperation among the people of all nations.
What it reported doing in 2016
The arts, cultural, and humanities programming at international house philadelphia (ihp) offers a diverse roster of cultural celebrations, film screenings, live performances, visual arts exhibitions, and educational lectures. In addition to ihp's curated programming, we collaborate with numerous local institutions, organizations and community groups to host events and film festivals, expanding our reach and impact in the philadelphia region. This year we saw continued success with our expanded series of cultural celebrations, which include lunar new year, diwali, nowruz, carnival, oktoberfest, and lftar. These events reflect ihp's mission to encourage mutual understanding and respect by and for people from different cultures around the world by participating in a variety of traditions different from their own. In the fine arts, ihp renamed its nearly 40-year-old film program to lightbox film center, which continues to be philadelphia's premier exhibitor of film and moving image art, presenting an unparalleled slate of repertory, nonfiction, experimental and international cinema. New programs added to the lightbox roster include arthouse revisited, a series dedicated to presenting classics of world cinema and independent film, and subversive elements, a monthly series dedicated to experimental film and artists' moving image. Additional highlights from this past year's program include a retrospective of works by pioneering french filmmakers jean-marie straub & daniele huillet; this is now: film and video after punk, a series rediscovering key underground films from the post-punk era in the uk featuring restorations by the british film institute national archive; from doodles to pixels: over a hundred years of spanish animation, a major retrospective spanning the wide range of animation films produced in spain; rediscovering a philadelphia pioneer: donya feuer's dance/film collaborations with ingmar bergman, romola nijinsky, and others, which focused on the dancer/choreographer's impressive body of experimental dance films; and 45 years of women make movies, a year-long celebration of the most significant distributor of independent films by and about women. We also continued our monthly family matinee series, introducing children to imaginative cinema from around the world. In continuation of our commitment to providing a venue for presenting works of cinema that engage audiences in dialogue about important global issues, we maintained partnerships with organizations such as blackstar film festival, cinema and media studies at the university of Pennsylvania, philadelphia asian american film festival, scribe video center, and others. Our continued partnership with intercultural journeys brought live world music and dance performances to our venue exploring the theme of homeland: cultural migrations through artistry. A new partnership formed with the da vinci art alliance added rotating art exhibits to our gallery space. We also presented community educational programs, including daca: a dying dream? In partnership with the mexican consulate of philadelphia and a conversation on immigration and the american city in collaboration with ai-bustan seeds of culture held at city hall.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 81% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 73
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 82
- Sustainability: 43
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 77.2%; rating input score 77
- Program expense ratio: 84.8%; rating input score 85
- Fundraising efficiency: $3.64 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 8.6%; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -21.1% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -9.3% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -14.8% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 77.2% of revenue deployed · 84.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 20 of 20 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $1.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 20 people listed
- Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2011 to 2016
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 14/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 6 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.