International Health Service

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
411427077
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Plymouth, MN, US
Rating
91
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
International Development

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$122,916
Expenses
$109,143
Assets
$187,406
Liabilities
$1,553

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Dale Watson (President Engineering Director)

People named in this filing

  • Dale Watson (President Engineering Director)
  • John Pope (Project Director Eye Care Director)
  • Steven Rice (Co-Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To serve with compassion, integrity, and hope, expanding access to medical, dental, and surgical services in communities that need them most.

What it reported doing in 2024

February 2024 provided medical dental care to with teams in Gracias Guanaja Morcoron and Lisangnipura Honduras. Mission team visited several remote villages on the Patuca River and provided medical and dental care. In Puerto Lempira Honduras both a surgery team and an eye team provided services to local residents. Provided dental services to 987 patients medical services to 2,167 adults,1,887 children two surgeries provided 7,238 pharmacy and RX 1,837 vitamin packets and provided eye glasses to 1,486 patients during missions in October 2024 and February 2025.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Liabilities are high compared with assets.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 86
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 63
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 82.3%; rating input score 82
  • Program expense ratio: 92.6%; rating input score 93

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 11.2%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.72; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 25% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 18.9% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.7% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 2 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 7 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: 82.3% of revenue deployed · 92.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $101K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 14 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 43/100.