International Guards Union of America Local # 3
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 626041955
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Oak Ridge, TN, USA
- Phone
- 8655910919
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $455,085
- Expenses
- $308,901
- Assets
- $941,507
- Liabilities
- $6,127
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JAMES POWERS (PRESIDENT (FORMER))
- BOBBY PARKER (VICE PRESIDENT)
- SEAN CASSIDY (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- BOBBY PARKER (VICE PRESIDENT): $33,350 total reported compensation
- SEAN CASSIDY (PRESIDENT): $18,977 total reported compensation
- TREVOR FOUST (TREASURER): $16,619 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Labor union.
What it reported doing in 2025
The primary purpose of the organization is to provide support and services for the guard union members.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 98% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 63
- Sustainability: 64
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 11
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 32.1%; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.05; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 47.7%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 5.9% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13.7% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 1 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $33K · 15 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2012 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 15 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 7 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 42/100.