International Golf Course Equipment Managers Association Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 261294138
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2014
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2014, Form 990-N 2008
- Location
- Rapid City, SD, USA
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Human Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $23,821
- Expenses
- $33,050
- Assets
- $11,478
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MIKE KRIZ (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- STEPHEN TUCKER (CHIEF EXEC O)
- MIKE KRIZ (PRESIDENT)
- CHRIS RAPP (VICE PRESIDE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide for and enhance the recognition of the golf course equipment manager/turf equipment technician as a professional; to advance the art of golf course equipment management; to collect and disseminate information concerning efficient and economical management of golf course equipment and related environmental issues; to promote, benefit, and improve the business conditions and promote the common interest of golf course equipment management.
What it reported doing in 2014
Igcema continued administering our various education programs. We continue to offer our voluntary certificate program which consists of six volumes of technical education, each followed with a proctored exam.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 20
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -38.7%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.35; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -15.1% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2.4% per year; rating input score 0; 37th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2010 to 2014
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 13/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.