International Foundation for Social Impact Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
815408487
IRS 990 coverage
2017–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
NY, NY, USA
Phone
2129617642
Rating
63
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,849,863
Expenses
$2,895,839
Assets
$2,207,320
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Sang Gupta (President & CEO)

People named in this filing

  • Sang Gupta (President & CEO)
  • Jaideep Khanna (Secretary)
  • Anita Manwani (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Mission: To uplift the people of world by doing all acts that lead to effective implementation of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and supporting stakeholders across the government, non-government, and private/public sector organizations globally.and Purpose To do all acts for improvement in sectors including but not limited to education, pollution, climate change, healthcare, governance, womens empowerment, justice, science and technology, urban and rural development, philanthropic and individual giving for social sector, economic development, capacity building, bringing learning from other countries and other important sectors for Indias growth and development. To take up various projects and initiatives in partnership with the government, NGOs, and other organizations in the above-mentioned sectors for improving the outcomes for the beneficiary To engage in all other lawful and allied activities as may be incidental or conducive to the promotion and furtherance of main object of

What it reported doing in 2025

1. To support research aiming to systematically measure everyday giving at the household level through annual survey rounds with rotating themes.2.To support by organising Educational and training programs and focusing on core areas, i.e. Learning and Development, Convenings, Research & IP, Leadership engagement for the Centre of Excellence (COE) and Alumni community Engagement.3.To support the creation of public goods and knowledge products, organise convenings, training workshops and programs for the nonprofit sector, as well as the provision of targeted support to philanthropists and CSRs in India

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 82
  • Transparency & Controls: 84
  • Accountability: 0
  • Sustainability: 31
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 79.9%; rating input score 80
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 0 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -56.5%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.76; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -4% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.3% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 79.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 0 of 5 board members independent · 0 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $2.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $472K reported
  • Consistency: 14 of 15 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2017 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grants require schedule f did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 35/100.