International Foundation for Alternative Research in AIDS Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
650581840
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2009–2017
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2017
Location
Portland, OR, USA
Phone
5035456217
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Health

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$67,630
Expenses
$71,106
Assets
$25,937
Liabilities
$28,891

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • FRED SCHAICH (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • FRED SCHAICH (PRESIDENT)
  • MICHAEL MCVEIGH MD (VICE PRESIDE)
  • RICHARD CARPENTER (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Broaden the possibilities of treatment, treatment access and the knowledge of treaments to all people who live with HIV/AIDS, as well as other associated life-threatening diseases or conditions.

What it reported doing in 2017

Foster research in the field of HIV/AIDS. Provide treatments information through multiple forms of media for both the affected and infected communities. Create a balance of infara's treatment information, education, and advocacy for all communities of color, life-style and culture. Advocate for access to all forms of treatment and prevention for all needful individuals. Produce both non-accredited and accredited cme and ceu treatment education programs in co-sponsorship with certifying accrediting organizations, utilizing multimedia forms or programming.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 26
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -5.1%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.36; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.11; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 3.3%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.5% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 0.9% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1.8% per year; rating input score 0; 36th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $71K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2009 to 2017
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 35/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 24/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 5/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.