International Forum on Business Ethical Conduct

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
454709927
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Arlington, VA, USA
Phone
7033581000
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Human Services N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$121,545
Expenses
$75,537
Assets
$106,622
Liabilities
$28,622

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BRY SPINELLA (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • BRY SPINELLA (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • NADIA KADER (EXECUTIVE SECRETARIAT UNTIL 02/2025)
  • STEVEN PEGG (CHAIR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

International forum on business ethical conduct for the aerospace and defense industry (ifbec) is an international organization whose purpose is to promote and foster through the global principles the development of global, industry-wide ethical standards for the companies that are active in the aerospace and defense business sector. Ifbec organizes opportunities for industry and relevant stakeholders to exchange information and best practices concerning ethical business challenges, practices and opportunities worldwide.

What it reported doing in 2025

Annual conference: ifbec hosts an annual conference each year. These conferences bring together non-governmental organizations, government representatives, major american and european companies from the aerospace and defense sectors, and industry representatives from countries across the globe for a robust dialogue regarding issues related to ethical business conduct. More than 100 aerospace and defense industry representatives from around the world participate annually. The conference rotates annually between europe and the united states.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 67% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 63
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 37.9%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.41; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.27; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 46.1%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -3.3% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 13/100.