International Federation of Professional & Technical Engineers

Overview

Mission

The objectives of this local union shall be to unite into one labor organization, through the authority of the membership as defined in article v, all workers eligible for membership, regardless of religion, race, creed, color, national origin, age, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, marital status, physical or mental disability, or political affiliation or opinion, to secure improved working conditions, wages, hours, and other economic and social advantages for its members; to promote the rights of workers and the security and welfare of all people by political, educational and other community activity; to secure the promotion or rejection of legislation affecting the membership; and to inform, advise, and educate its members and all workers in the principles of the international federation of professional and technical engineers and of the benefits to be derived through collective bargaining and joint action. It is further the objective of the local union to carry out its work

Operating model

Revenue model

Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.

Distribution model

Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

• Financial Efficiency: 0
• Transparency & Controls: 67
• Accountability: 84
• Sustainability: 56
• Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Details

• Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
• Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
• Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $13.7M in reported program spending
• Leadership: top reported pay $259K · 16 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
• Highest-paid contractors: 3 contractors listed · $625K reported
• Consistency: 14 of 17 current checks pass · 3 findings to review
• Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes grants and executive pay
• Filing history: 8 filing years from 2017 to 2024
• Contacts: How to reach this organization
• Money network: 11 filed money-flow records
• Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
• Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
• People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

• High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
• High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
• Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
• Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
• Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
• Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
• Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 52/100.
• Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 30/100.
• Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 43/100.