International Expressive Arts Therapy Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
943203797
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2017, Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
San Francisco, CA, USA
Phone
4154890698
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Arts Education

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$110,605
Expenses
$112,706
Assets
$314,662

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

People named in this filing

  • DR SUSAN PAUL JOHNSON (Treasurer)
  • ALLISON WILSON (EXEC. CO-CHAIR)
  • SAGE PHOENIX (EXEC. CO-CHAIR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose of ieata is as follows:1) to establish recognition of the profession of arts therapy while supporting the growth and development of an integrated arts approach to psychotherapy and related forms of personal growth and healing.2) to promote the improvement of standards of practice and business in the expressive arts field.3) to promote the advancement of artistic inquiry as well as the advancement and publishing of other forms of research in the expressive arts therapy field.4) to provide vehicles for the ongoing exchange of information regarding expressive arts therapy and its application to the general public, other professionals and related fields.

What it reported doing in 2024

Programs and activities conducted1) international conference - provides members with a forum to meet and present their latest research and methodologies.2) newsletter - includes most current work in the field.3) registration process for expressive arts therapists.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 85
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 46
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 86%; rating input score 86
  • Program expense ratio: 84.4%; rating input score 84

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1.9%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.79; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -2.4% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.3% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 17.1% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 86% of revenue deployed · 84.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $95K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2012 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 28/100.