International Experiential Dynamic Therapy Association Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
223816071
IRS 990 coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Austin, TX, USA
Phone
5124238237
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues

Reported finances

Revenue
$302,862
Expenses
$244,626
Assets
$139,745
Liabilities
$3,244

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

15 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • TAMI CHELEW (PRESIDENT)
  • RON ALBUCHER (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
  • ALLAN ABBASS (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • TAMI CHELEW (PRESIDENT)
  • RON ALBUCHER (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
  • KAREN DINSMORE (CO-TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To organize, promote or sponsor scientific, social, and teaching events such as conferences, meetings, lectures, symposia and courses, related to the field of experiential short term dynamic psychotherapy. To organize, promote and sponsor scientific and teaching exchanges among members. To promote and encourage research projects relevant to the field of experiential short term dynamic psychotherapy. To promote and encourage members and others practicing in the field to publish books and papers on experiential short term dynamic therapies and related subjects. To set guidelines for the teaching of experiential short term dynamic therapies.

What it reported doing in 2024

Organized and promoted scientific, social, and teaching events related to the field of experiential short term dynamic psychotherapy.our biennial 2024 conference was held in san diego. We received $31,645 in scholarship donations for our biennial conference and distributed $25,808 in scholarship funds. This enabled 17 therapists and therapists in training to attend the conference who would otherwise have been unable to participate.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 88% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 94
  • Accountability: 70
  • Sustainability: 55
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 19.2%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.57; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 15 people listed
  • Consistency: 12 of 12 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 39/100.