International Energy Initiative Inc C/o Eric Larson
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 133634652
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2015–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Princeton, NJ, USA
- Phone
- 6092584966
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Energy Resources Conservation and Development
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $52,327
- Expenses
- $2,915
- Assets
- $184,269
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
People named in this filing
- PROFESSOR JOSE GOLDEMBERG (DIRECTOR)
- PROFESSOR THOMAS B JOHANSSON (DIRECTOR)
- DR ROBERT WILLIAMS (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose of the organization include, but are not limited to - promote, initiate, strengthen and advance -- the efficient production and use of energy for sustainable development. Strategy is focusing on developing countries. Disseminating an approach to energy, in which the level and quality of energy services is taken as the measure of development, rather than the magnitude of energy consumption and supply. Improving energy services through end-use efficiency measures and the increased use of environmentally cleaner new and renewable energy technologies. Ensuring that market restructuring and/or liberalization in the electricity and petroleum industries focuses on measures that expand the provision of public benefits.addressing policies, regulation, institutions, financing and management issues to promote sustainable energy practices. Initiating and strengthening capability in energy analysis, information, advocacy, and implementation in developing countries.
What it reported doing in 2025
Esd journal (energy for sustainable development) journal production highlighting issues related to energy efficiency and technologies, current projects, scientific finding, renewables, etc.the editorial board of energy for sustainable development views energy, not as an end in itself, but as an instrument of sustainable development. Submission of papers consistent with this view are encouraged. The editorial board wishes particularly to encourage papers (1) likely to be of interest to more than one professional group, (2) summarising, at a sufficiently technical level, work done on projects of special interest, or (3) offering extensive critical reviews. The board also wants to promote the publication of articles on, or that are relevant to, energy issues in developing countries and on north-south and south-south cooperation in energy technology development and application. The board considers the publication of highly specialized work more appropriate to other professional journals. The criteria for acceptance of the papers in esd are therefore quality of the work and its presentation and breadth of interest, irrespective of whether the paper reports research or development, theory or experiment, original work or review.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 90
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 94.4%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 63.21; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 20.7% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 20.4% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2015 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.