International Egg Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
475526209
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2019
Location
Cleveland, OH, USA
Phone
2164705633
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Public Foundations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$130,832
Expenses
$83,714
Assets
$113,616
Liabilities
$6,699

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CASSANDRA PRICE (CEO)

People named in this filing

  • BRUCE DOOYEMA (TRUSTEE AND CHAIRMAN)
  • PIERRE-MARIE BORNE (TRUSTEE)
  • WALTER SIEMANS - RESIGNED 11924 (TRUSTEE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our vision is to use the nutritional, environmental, social and economic power of the egg to unlock human potential. We are working from the ground up to create a sustainable food supply and self-sufficiency by supporting other international organizations providing financial support, technical expertise and facilitating the sharing of knowledge to assist in the development of egg production in regions where populations have no or insufficient access to high quality protein.

What it reported doing in 2024

The ief provides financial and technical support and equipment to the ebenezer agricultural training centre, in nampula, mozambique for practical egg production training courses. The center equips students between 17 and 25 years old with business, agricultural and life skills where they learn to grow crops, raise chickens, and produce eggs. Students get an opportunity to gain expertise while earning an income by caring for a small plot of land and tending to an egg operation.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and liabilities are high compared with assets.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 68
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 72
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 55.6%; rating input score 56
  • Program expense ratio: 86.9%; rating input score 87

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 36%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.36; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 36.2% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 9.2% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 35% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 55.6% of revenue deployed · 86.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $73K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 56/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 29/100.