International Disciples Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 260281947
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2013–2014
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2014, Form 990-N 2012
- Location
- Richardson, TX, USA
- Phone
- 2148018094
- Rating
- 54
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Scholarships, Student Financial Aid Services, Awards
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $189,300
- Expenses
- $189,300
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Al Angell (President)
- Wilfred Job (Executive Director)
People named in this filing
- Al Angell (President)
- Hugh Blevins (Secretary)
- Wilfred Job (Executive Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
INTERNATIONAL DISCIPLES FOUNDATION (IDF), a Texas nonprofit corporation, is organized and operated exclusively for charitable, religious and educational purposes within the meaning of Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code). Within the scope of the foregoing purposes, IDF will operate a Christ-centered ministry focused upon international students attending universities, colleges and schools in Dallas, Texas and throughout the North Texas area. In furtherance of these purposes IDF will offer a variety of programs to serve the religious and physical needs of foreign students including programs offering hospitality, counseling, and spiritual and educational guidance and support. To achieve its purposes IDF shall associate with churches and organizations in The United Methodist Church, and other churches and organizations when appropriate. In addition, IDF may make grants to individuals and to other charitable, religious and educational organi
What it reported doing in 2014
Emergency Assistance - International students are not unlike other students, in that unforeseen events can arise. Unfortunately, these students do not have the ability or contacts here in the U.S. to obtain these funds in a timely manner. We provided grants to international students for these emergencies, such as a return flight home for a funeral or emergency medical expenses.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 21
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 24
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 21.1%; rating input score 21
- Program expense ratio: 21.1%; rating input score 21
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -108.3% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 14% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -200% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 21.1% of revenue deployed · 21.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $40K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2013 to 2014
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 21/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 21/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 34/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.