International Crane Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
391187711
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Baraboo, WI, USA
Phone
6083569462
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Bird Sanctuary, Preserve

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$17,664,216
Expenses
$15,693,530
Assets
$71,280,712
Liabilities
$1,548,993

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

37 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • RICHARD BEILFUSS (PRESIDENT/CEO/DIRECTOR)
  • KARI STAUFFER (VICE PRESIDENT OF DEVELOPMENT)
  • TODD HOLMAN (VICE PRESIDENT OF GLOBAL HR)
  • MAHENDRA SHRESTHA (VICE PRESIDENT, ASIA PROGRAMS)

Highest reported compensation

  • RICHARD BEILFUSS (PRESIDENT/CEO/DIRECTOR): $290,298 total reported compensation
  • STEVE KUHN (CFO): $159,863 total reported compensation
  • KARI STAUFFER (VICE PRESIDENT OF DEVELOPMENT): $143,247 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The international crane foundation is committed to a world where cranes, people, and our natural heritage thrive together.

What it reported doing in 2025

Asiasouth and southeast asia are home to the threatened sarus crane and support wintering populations of black-necked, demoiselle, and eurasian cranes. Strong cultural and spiritual ties to sarus cranes in the hindu and buddhist religions of this region provide unique opportunities to engage people in the conservation of these intensely settled landscapes using the revered sarus crane as a flagship species. The foundation leads two key conservation programs in the region. For more than thirty years, the foundation has engaged in conservation of the mekong delta region of vietnam and cambodia, including establishing tram chim national park (the largest wetland protected area in vietnam), training a network of wetland scientists and managers that spans the region, and creating a global model for community-based wetland conservation at phu my, vietnam. In the ayeyarwady delta of myanmar, our goal is to ensure long-term survival of sarus cranes and other biodiversity by demonstrating that natural floating rice can support sustainable livelihoods, rich biodiversity, and a healthier environment for cranes and people as an alternative to intensive, ecologically-damaging rice production. The foundation provides farmer training to improve floating rice production, help them generate new income streams by creating a brand of wildlife-friendly "sarus rice, and monitor biodiversity and livelihood benefits.east asia is home to eight crane species (the most of any region), including five threatened crane species - critically endangered siberian cranes, endangered red crowned cranes, and vulnerable hooded, white-naped and black-necked cranes. Intense land and water development pressures due to rapid economic growth threaten wetlands of vital importance to crane survival in this region. This conservation program builds on the strong cultural ties to cranes in east asia to engage people and policy makers in conservation of protected areas and their surrounding landscapes. The program also addresses the global impact china's development and resource use will have on crane areas around the world. Conservation programs in east asia include securing cranes and their key wetlands in the amur/heilong river basin; sustaining viable wintering grounds for cranes in southeastern china; conserving black-necked cranes and their key wetlands in western china; national outreach in china; crane conservation in the korean dmz; and crane flyway conservation across east asia.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 79% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 76% for direct work, and 24% for grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 73
  • Transparency & Controls: 70
  • Accountability: 91
  • Sustainability: 65
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 76.1%; rating input score 76
  • Program expense ratio: 82.1%; rating input score 82
  • Fundraising efficiency: $10.34 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
    • Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
    • Requires narrative reports: Fail
    • Conducts field audits: Fail
    • May suspend future funding: Fail
    • Requires financial reports: Fail
    • Conducts site visits: Fail
    • Requires grant agreements: Fail
    • May require repayment: Fail
  • Grant itemization coverage: 85%; rating input score 85; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 11.2%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.54; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7.8%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 10.2% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.2% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.6% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 76.1% of revenue deployed · 82.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 26 of 28 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $12.9M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $290K · 37 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $368K reported
  • Consistency: 40 of 41 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 11 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 11 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 7 of 8 not reported.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 34/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 37/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.