International Council of Holistic Education and Learning
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 812154064
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Centennial, CO, USA
- Phone
- 7202061400
- Rating
- 89
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Adult, Continuing Education
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,526
- Expenses
- $1,420
- Assets
- $3,117
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- John Brown (President)
- Javier Lastres (Executive Director)
People named in this filing
- John Brown (President)
- Ron Green (Secretary)
- Carl Emmons (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Holistic Education Accreditation
What it reported doing in 2024
In 2024, International Council of Holistic Education and Learning maintained certification of more than 150 schools/ programs, three higher educational degree programs Served: 140000+ Holistic Education Standards Development International Council of Holistic Education and Learning worked with qualified educators and industry collaborators to review for exemplary holistic education Served 200000+ Holistic Education Industry Research International Council of Holistic Education and Learning conducts ongoing research to remain the leader in the Holistic Education Industry to ensure and publish on best practices based on current research. Served 100000+.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 96
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 62
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 93.5%; rating input score 94
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 6.9%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.2; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 12.1% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11.3% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 80.7% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 93.5% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 58/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.