International Contemporary Ensemble
Legal name: International Contemporary Ensemble Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 134192400
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Brooklyn, NY, US
- Phone
- 347.227.7320
- Rating
- 66
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Music
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $912,864
- Expenses
- $1,413,349
- Assets
- $688,668
- Liabilities
- $256,165
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
20 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CLAUDE ARPELS (CO-PRESIDENT)
- SAYIDDAH MCCREE (CO-PRESIDENT)
- JENNIFER KESSLER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (THROUGH 3/2025))
- BILLY FIDLER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (FROM 7/2025))
Highest reported compensation
- JENNIFER KESSLER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (THROUGH 3/2025)): $125,720 total reported compensation
- JOSHUA RUBIN (TRUSTEE): $42,519 total reported compensation
- GEORGE LEWIS (ARTISTIC DIRECTOR): $36,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The International Contemporary Ensemble strives to create a more open and inclusive mosaic ecosystem.
What it reported doing in 2024
Under george lewis' leadership, our programming continues to embrace "polyaspora: a new consciousness for new music." the ensemble presented 50+ events during the 2024-2025 concert season, including performances, workshops, and recordings (in-person, online, and hybrid) across the u.s. And internationally. The season highlighted lewis's vision for a multiplicitous, global future for contemporary music. We presented 57 premieres and 11 commissions, collaborating with nearly 300 musicians and 242 composers, while partnering with institutions and festivals to engage over 200 students and young artists in the u.s. And abroad.our signature composing while black concert series presents unique and vital perspectives on the work of afrodiasporic experimental composers, voices that have often been overlooked in academic, curatorial, and journalistic contexts. We presented four performances this season, including a residency at uc irvine and uc riverside, at nyu skirball center in collaboration with the members of association for the advancement of creative musicians, at reid hall in paris in partnership with the columbia paris global center, and the columbia institute for ideas and imagination, and museum of modern art.the ensemble continued its commitment to education through residencies at the walden school, usdan summer camp, and international programs such as iyca ticino. We also hosted a two-day ensemble evolution alumni celebration and recorded works by luna composition lab artists, culminating in a performance at carnegie hall, supporting the next generation of composers.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 79
- Transparency & Controls: 55
- Accountability: 81
- Sustainability: 13
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 68.7%; rating input score 69
- Fundraising efficiency: $2.54 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
- Grant itemization coverage: Scored; rating input score 0
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 76.5%; rating input score 76; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -54.8%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.49; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.37; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 18.2%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -3.7% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -4.2% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 5 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 68.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 17 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $971K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $126K · 20 people listed
- Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and foreign activity
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 7/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 17/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 21/100.