International Consensus Meeting on Infection C/o Cheshire Law Group

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
842046241
IRS 990 coverage
2019–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Philadelphia, PA, USA
Phone
2152878989
Rating
70
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Nerve, Muscle, Bone Diseases Research

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$169,983
Expenses
$180,051
Assets
$1,141,191
Liabilities
$284,119

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • TIFFANY MORRISON GRECH (PRESIDENT, DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • TIFFANY MORRISON GRECH (PRESIDENT, DIRECTOR): $33,695 total reported compensation
  • CAMILO RESTREPO MD (SECRETARY, DIRECTOR): $1,000 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of the international consensus meeting on infection is to organize, write, and distribute consensus statements and other guidelines in the field of orthopaedics. (continue in sch o)the icmi is committed to improve and standardize patient care and medical treatment decisions based on international collaboration with top experts in the field of orthopaedics and based on a thorough review of available literature, standard practices, and expert opinion regarding various topics in orthopaedics and other relevant fields such as infection control. The mission of the icmi is to increase awareness of prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of musculoskeletal infections by publishing consensus statements developed utilizing the delphi method of literature review and expert consensus. Consensus statements created following meetings will be disseminated to the orthopaedic community in order to impact patient care around the globe.

What it reported doing in 2024

The icmi is committed to the improvement and standardization of patient care and medical treatment decisions based on international collaboration with top experts in the field of orthopaedics and based on a thorough review of available literature, standard practices, and expert opinion regarding various topics in orthopaedics and other relevant fields such as infection control. Major international consensus meetings have been held twice by the organization: once in 2013 and the second in 2018. These meetings have changed the way patients with these types of infections are being treated all over the world. The third version of the meeting was being organizied in 2024 to be held in 2025. This much-anticipated meeting will highlight any relevant changes in the literature based and technology. The meeting in 2025 will prove to be the biggest one.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 83% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 74% for direct work, and 26% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 60
  • Transparency & Controls: 96
  • Accountability: 58
  • Sustainability: 42
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 69.2%; rating input score 69
  • Program expense ratio: 59.2%; rating input score 59
  • Fundraising efficiency: $4.25 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 60%; rating input score 60; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 56
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Fail
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -5.9%; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.34; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.25; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 19.3%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 36.6% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -4.3% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 26.9% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 69.2% of revenue deployed · 59.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 3 of 5 board members independent · 5 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $107K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $34K · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 26 of 27 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2019 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 59/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 9 not reported.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 19/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 28/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 18/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 20/100.