International Coaching Federation of New England Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
043568068
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2014
Location
Pittsfield, MA, USA
Phone
9788697492
Rating
64
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues

Reported finances

Revenue
$110,094
Expenses
$75,969
Assets
$147,319

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • RICHARD BROWN (PRESIDENT)
  • LIZ MYERS (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)
  • LYNN BAGDASIAN (MEMBERSHIP VICE PRESIDENT)
  • HEATHER WILKERSON (EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CO-VICE PRESIDENT)
  • ZEINA NABIB (EDUCTAION AND DEVELOPMENT CO-VICE PRESIDENT)
  • AARON BART (MARKETING VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • RICHARD BROWN (PRESIDENT)
  • LIZ MYERS (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)
  • SUSAN CLANCY (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide a forum for professional development and preservation of professional integrity among personal and business coaches

What it reported doing in 2024

To provide a forum for professional development through aseries of member events including monthly meetings, teleclasses and an annual conference.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 93% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 46
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 70
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 39.6%; rating input score 40
  • Program expense ratio: 57.4%; rating input score 57

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 31%; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.94; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.5% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.6% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 11.5% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 39.6% of revenue deployed · 57.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $44K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2015 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 40/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 57/100.