International Center of Worcester

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
042375529
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2009–2013
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2013
Location
Worcester, MA, USA
Rating
34
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Ethnic, Immigrant Centers

Reported finances

Revenue
$104,412
Expenses
$120,675
Assets
$40,487
Liabilities
$15,602

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JULIA DVORKO (PRESIDENT)
  • ROYCE ANDERSON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • PHYLLIS ESTUS (VP)
  • NAN JOHNSON (DIRECTOR)
  • GEORGE NETCH (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Promote international friendship

What it reported doing in 2013

Foreign visitors were hosted & trained in worc volunteers provided over 360 homestay nights and addl meals for the visitors

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 87% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 17
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -15.6%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.34; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.39; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 26.6%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -80% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -12% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -10.3% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2009 to 2013
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 30/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 15/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 19/100.