International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union 692
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 381036592
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Bay City, MI, USA
- Phone
- 9896844510
- Rating
- 66
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,714,199
- Expenses
- $1,482,491
- Assets
- $2,364,362
- Liabilities
- $2,616
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BRIAN WALKER (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- RYAN CHARNEY (EXAMINING BO): $188,301 total reported compensation
- AUGUST VOISINE (VICE PRESIDE): $164,869 total reported compensation
- BRENDON BARANEK (EXAMINING BO): $153,898 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The international brotherhood of electrical workers local union no. 692 is crafted for the purpose of improving the economic and working conditions of its memebers under a collectively bargained agreement, on behalf of the international brotherhood of electrical workers local union no. 692, in compliance with the taft-hartley act.
What it reported doing in 2025
The international brotherhood of electrical workers local union no. 692 is crafted for the purpose of improving the economic and working conditions of its members under a collectively bargained agreement, on behalf of the international brotherhood of electrical workers local union no. 692, in compliance with the taft-hartley act.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 84% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 67% for direct work, 28% for affiliated organizations, and 5% for member benefits.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has grown recently. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 74
- Transparency & Controls: 56
- Accountability: 59
- Sustainability: 55
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 80.4%; rating input score 80
- Program expense ratio: 89.6%; rating input score 90
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 68.8%; rating input score 69; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 44
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 13.5%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.59; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 42.6%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.6% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.2% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.8% per year; rating input score 100; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 80.4% of revenue deployed · 89.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 16 board members independent · 4 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $188K · 17 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 32 of 33 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 16 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 9 not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 57/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule D land buildings reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.