International Brotherhood of Electrical Local 760
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 620353074
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Knoxville, TN, USA
- Phone
- 8655248638
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,763,967
- Expenses
- $1,771,430
- Assets
- $4,850,017
- Liabilities
- $173,469
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- COLE COKER (VICE PRESIDENT)
- BRIAN CONNOR (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- STEPHAN LOCKE (BOARD MEMBER)
- JAMES RUSS CRUME (BOARD MEMBER)
- RICK MATLOCKE (BOARD MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Electrical workers 760 was chartered on may 4th, 1925. We aim: - to pursue and establish and maintain an adequate wage for our labor. - to require of our members skill, intelligence, and character. - to protect our employer agents against the unskilled and inexperienced worker. - to advance the principles and practices of conciliation and arbitration - in settlement of any difference with our employers. - to defend our rights and advance our interest as electrical workers by all lawful means. - to aid and encourage all honorable efforts that will better the conditions of our labor. - to make our card and seal a certificate of fraternity, honesty, efficiency, and reliability.
What it reported doing in 2025
The training facility is utilized to train and develop members of the union local 760
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Affiliate network. The nonprofit sent 68% of its reported program spending through affiliated organizations.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 66
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 50
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 74.2%; rating input score 74
- Program expense ratio: 73.7%; rating input score 74
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.4%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.74; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.8% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.4% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 74.2% of revenue deployed · 73.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $1.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 15 people listed
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 29/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 47/100.